For my TED talk I watched Hanna Rosin’s
presentation on the rise of women in the work force in the past few years. She
had some pretty surprising statistics on how women are actually surpassing men
in graduation rate as well as the work force. According to Hanna women
currently make up more of the job market than men and it is not just in menial
jobs. Women are starting to become the majority in a lot of fields. Women are
more likely to be managers, and this shift is present in other high powered
jobs, which came as a shock to me. I was still under the impression that there
were more men in most fields and I think that is because I grew up being taught
that the men are the “bread winners,” men “bring home the bacon,” and that
women are meant to stay at home with the kids, and I think most of society is
still under that impression. I think that while the power dynamic in the
working world is starting to shift, it is going to take a while for society to
recognize that a sense of equality in terms of the number of women working is
the norm. Hanna mentioned that college girls now are starting to think of being
a working mother as the expected outcome of their life, which I definitely
relate to. I was always under the impression that my life would take a path leading
me to a strong career. I’m interested to see how the future generations of
women tend. It could be a pendulum and we are in the middle of the swing
towards a female majority before shifting back or this trend may continue until
stay-at-home dads are the new norm.
Relating this talk back to Dress for Success is actually pretty interesting.
With this whole idea of women surpassing men in the work force the
organization’s goal doesn’t quite seem to fit the statistics. However, Hanna
mentioned that the middle class is disappearing for men and women and Dress for
Success works with the women that are in that lower class. With
this whole swing to an era where women are often the “bread winners,”
especially after the recession, it will be interesting to see how that lower
class will be affected by work done by Dress for Success and similar
organizations. With so much support for women who are in a situation where a
low class job is needed, along with increasing competition for the low class jobs
between men and women, it might lead to a similar shift towards a women run
work force that the upper class jobs are experiencing. I think Dress for
Success’ goal to have a world with women being financially independent is very
attainable and likely with the way the statistics are looking.
The actually presentation part of the talk
done by Hanna was pretty good. She sounded like she really understood her
information and was very relaxed. The conversational part of speaking that we
learned was so important was definitely present. Although, one fault I would
say she had was a tendency to look back at the screen pretty often. Her
presentation also seemed very geared towards women, and it seemed like most of
the audience was women, but this being online it might have been better for her
to make it a little more male friendly. She also started talking about the
glass ceiling in her conclusion, which I don’t think fit too well since nothing
about it had been mentioned in the entire rest of the speech. Her conclusion
also again seemed like it was a little targeted towards women. But besides that
the talk was very interesting and I would suggest it to others.
http://www.singleblackmale.org/2012/03/12/women-are-right-men-are-the-new-ball-and-chain/ |
This seems like a really interesting TED Talk. I went to an all girl high school whose motto was "women making a difference". I feel like this goes hand in hand with what Dress for Success is doing (except it doesn't focus on the lower class, just women in general). When in high school, I was also under the impression that people were still assuming women should stay at home and take care of the house. That is why I was driven to get a degree and become a successful business women in college. I realize now that women don't have it as bad as society is making it seem, but I do have to say that it gave me the drive that I needed which I am extremely grateful for.
ReplyDeleteIts very true that women don't have it as bad as it has been portrayed in the past, but I agree with you that the way it was portrayed made me want to succeed that much more. I actually did my paper earlier in the semester on a similar topic and it is pretty interesting seeing how the stats on stay at home moms are decreasing and stay at home dads are becoming more popular. It really changed my view on the whole workforce equality topic.
DeleteVery strong and hot button topic. Don't get me wrong, it was definitely demeaning and wrong to withhold women's rights to own property, hold office, vote, etc., but what exactly is Rosin and this current women's movement striving for? The idea that started the women's movements was "equality", this is going far and above that, labeling men as "the new ball and chain". It sounds almost as if she is playing the game of revenge, using the current stats of women graduating from college and entering the workforce as a way to 'get back' and make up for the atrocities women suffered and suffer still today. She's fighting fire with fire here, and making a bad situation worse by putting people on the defensive. The real problem is the stigma we associate with raising children and "taking care of the house". There is no shame in that vital job, only society-imposed devaluation. Women can and do play a very beneficial role in the workforce, regardless of whether or no they are in the workforce. I credit Rosin for voicing her opinion and interpretation of the data, but she's missing the big picture here.
ReplyDeleteWell done on the analysis. You outlined the talk well and brought out her strong and weak points as a speaker.
I definitely got that revenge vibe as well. To be honest I didn't really feel like there was a strong point being made in the talk. It kind of all felt like her sharing how happy she was that women were starting to surpass men in the workforce and graduation rate. She definitely could have presented the material in a better way.
Delete